Lumen Aesthetics
F
Fieldbrook Marketing
The Vault

Brand Guide

v1.0 · July 2026 Source of truth

The look, the voice, the pillars, the governed numbers, and the services. Anyone building something in Lumen's name works from this page. If a draft disagrees with what is written here, the draft is wrong.

And one thing outranks everything else on this page. Lumen is a licensed medical practice, so its advertising is regulated. The eight claim rules below are not tone preferences. Read them before you read anything else.

Governing law, not style advice

The claim rules. They override the brief.

They override tone. They override the campaign objective. They override a request from the client, and they override the client's own enthusiasm. Every one of the eight has been asked for at some point, in a brief that sounded completely reasonable. A refusal here is this system working, not failing.

01
Never guarantee a result. No "guaranteed," no "you will," no "results you can count on." Every outcome sentence is hedged and individual: most people, typically, in our experience, your results will depend on. And if you can delete the hedge and the sentence still parses as a promise, you never actually hedged. You decorated.
02
Never state or imply permanence. Almost no treatment is permanent. "Long-lasting" is fine when it is true. "Permanent" is not. This includes the hair-removal wording: the term of art is reduction, not removal, and even that is not something we lead with.
03
Never minimize risk. Never omit downtime. No "painless," "risk-free," "zero downtime," "no side effects." If a treatment has downtime, the copy says so. "Minimal downtime," "little to no downtime," and "some social downtime" are all violations wearing a cardigan. Omitting downtime is a compliance violation, not a copywriting choice.
04
"FDA-approved" is a trap. Devices and drugs have specific, narrow approvals. Never attach it to a treatment, an outcome, or the practice. If a specific approval has to be cited, it gets checked against the services catalog first. That file is the canonical source for what may be said about each service.
05
Before and after photos need written consent on file. Unretouched. Consistent lighting. A visible individual-results disclaimer. No stock. No borrowed images. No filters. If consent status is unknown, the photo does not run. If nobody can produce the consent record in under a minute, the answer is no.
06
A patient's words are a review, never a clinical claim. We may quote a real review. Verbatim, first name and last initial, nothing added. We may not turn it into evidence. A result described in a patient's voice is still a claim. And adjacency does it too: a quote next to a photo, a price, or a product name is a claim you did not write and are still responsible for.
07
No pricing in public copy. Not a range. Not a "starting at." Not "affordable." Not in a DM, and a DM is public copy. Aesthetic treatment is consultation-dependent, and a printed price implies a plan nobody has made for a face nobody has examined. "Free" and "complimentary" are prices too. A zero is a number like any other.
08
When a brief asks for something on this list, you do not write it. Flag the conflict, cite the rule, and offer the compliant version instead. Do not soften it, do not find a quieter phrasing, do not split the difference. You cannot rewrite your way out of a non-compliant request. You can only produce a quieter version of the same violation.
How this actually breaks, and it is never how you expect. Not through carelessness. Through fluency. A polished draft arrives with one sentence in it that reads "most patients see smooth, natural results within days." It is beautiful. It is a guarantee wearing a hedge as a costume, and it will sail past you because everything around it is good.

The tell: if a sentence promises the reader something about their own face, it is wrong. Lumen's copy explains what a treatment does. It never tells anyone what will happen to them.
The pre-flight check, before anything ships Does it promise or imply a result? Does it state or imply permanence? Does it omit downtime where downtime exists? Does it contain a price, a range, or a "starting at"? Does it use a patient's words as clinical evidence? Does it use a photo whose consent status you have not personally verified? Does it attach "FDA-approved" to a treatment, a practice, or an outcome? Does every number trace to a key in section 06?

A draft that fails any of these is not a draft that needs polish. It is a draft that needs to not exist.
01

Logos

The logo is a wordmark, with nothing beside it. No glyph was drawn, and that is deliberate. The spec is explicit that the mark is never accompanied by a sparkle, a star, a syringe, a leaf, a butterfly, or a lotus, and the only permitted reduced form is the L monogram. Restraint is not an aesthetic preference here. It is the argument. A brand that shouts is a brand that needs you to buy today, and Lumen's whole promise is that it doesn't.

LUMEN AESTHETICS
Stacked lockup, primary · Ink on Bone
LUMEN AESTHETICS
Reversed · Bone on Ink

The horizontal lockup

LUMEN AESTHETICS

Wide, short spaces only. A site header, an email banner, a letterhead. The subline sits to the right of the wordmark and is baseline-aligned. Everywhere else, use the stacked lockup.

The monogram

L
L

The L alone. Social avatars, the favicon, a stamp on a folder. Nowhere else. On Bone with a Clay hairline is the default.

Clear space, and the minimum size

  • Clear space equals the height of the L, on all four sides. Nothing enters it. Not a photo edge, not a rule, not another logo, not a caption.
  • The minimum size is a rule, not a measurement, because a rule survives a re-render and a number does not: if the AESTHETICS subline is not comfortably legible, you are not permitted to use a lockup that contains it. Use the monogram. There is no "just squint" size.
  • Do not shrink the lockup to fit. Swap to the monogram.

Never do this to the logo

  • Never on gold. Never on a gradient. Never on marble.
  • Never over a face, and never over a photograph busy enough that you would want to add a scrim to fix it. The scrim is the tell. Pick a different photo.
  • Never with a drop shadow, an outer glow, a bevel, or a halo.
  • Never rotated, arced, or set on a curve.
  • Never accompanied by a sparkle, a star, a syringe, a leaf, a butterfly, or a lotus. There is no glyph, and adding one is not a small liberty. It is a different brand.
  • Never stretched, condensed, or re-spaced. Never recoloured outside the palette. Never re-typeset by hand. Use the asset file.
  • There is no Ember in the logo. The accent is rationed for the layout, not spent on the mark.
No download links here on purpose. This page is the identity in words and pictures, so any draft can get the look right without opening the asset folder. The logo files themselves live in the Vault's brand-assets folder, and the written spec is the source of truth. If the two ever disagree, the spec wins.
02

Color

Warm clinical. The room temperature of a very good doctor's office that happens to have excellent taste. Not a spa, not a hotel lobby, not a luxury boutique. Bone and oatmeal neutrals, a deep ink, one restrained warm accent. Nothing else.

Bone
#F6F2EB
surface-primary
The default background of nearly everything. Warm white, never blue-white. Bone is the brand.
Oatmeal
#E7DFD3
surface-secondary
Section breaks, cards, quiet contrast against Bone.
Clay
#C9BEB0
muted-rule
Hairlines, dividers, disabled states, image borders. Never for text.
Ink
#1B211F
text-primary
All body copy, all display type, the logo. A near-black with a green undertone. Ink is not black.
Slate
#4A524E
text-secondary
Captions, metadata, secondary interface text.
Ember
#B4573C
accent
One accent moment per composition. A rule under a headline, a link, a single button. That is the entire job.
Clinic
#FDFCFA
surface-document
Print, forms, anything that needs to read as a document.

How to use it

  • Bone is the brand. If someone squints at a Lumen asset from across a room, they should see a warm off-white rectangle with a small amount of very dark type on it. That is the look. It is aggressively unfashionable and it is why it works.
  • Ember is rationed. One accent moment per composition. If you can find it twice, remove one. The accent's power is entirely a function of its scarcity, and the second it appears three times, the design becomes a brochure.
  • Ink is not black. Do not substitute pure black. Pure black next to warm neutrals reads as cheap and cold, and it is the single fastest way to make this palette look like every other med spa.
  • No gradients. Not in a background, not in a button, not behind a headline, not in an ad. Flat colour only.
  • No colour as decoration. Colour here carries meaning: surface, text, or the one accent. Colour that is just there to be pretty is a category tell.
  • Ember on Bone is borderline for small text. Treat Ember as a display and interface accent. Never set a paragraph in it.

Forbidden, and every one of these is a category default

Gold foil on matte black The single most exhausted look in medical aesthetics. And rose gold, while we are here.
Millennial pink Blush, dusty rose, and their entire family.
Marble Terrazzo. Veined stone of any kind.
Sparkles Stars, glitter, shimmer. Starburst badges. Price bubbles. Countdown timers, which are also a claim-rule violation.
Pure black It breaks the warmth on contact. Use Ink.
Any gradient at all Gradient meshes, glassmorphism, frosted panels, blurred blobs.

And the photography anti-patterns, which matter more than the colour ones

  • Before and after grids and split-screen sliders. The category's signature format, and a compliance surface besides.
  • Ring-lit, shadowless, flawless faces. The visual signature of the entire category, and it looks like it is hiding something because it is.
  • Retouched or smoothed skin. No retouching of skin texture. Ever. A practice whose promise is honesty about faces cannot airbrush the faces in its advertising. Remove a stray hair or a lint fleck. That is the boundary.
  • Anyone photographed as a problem. A hand pointing at a line. A circle drawn around a "trouble spot." Nobody is a before.
  • A needle approaching a face. It is fear-based and it is beneath the practice.
  • Stock photography. None. Ever. Not as a placeholder, because placeholders ship. If there is no real image, the answer is type on Bone, or the room, or nothing.
The test, and it is the same as the voice test. Swap the logo for a competitor's. If the design still works, it isn't Lumen's. If it looks like it is selling insecurity, it is wrong. If it looks like a jewelry ad, it is wrong.
03

Typography

A quiet serif for display, a clean grotesque for everything else. The serif does the "medicine has been practiced for a long time" work. The grotesque does the "and this is a modern, competent clinic" work. Two faces. No third.

About the specimens on this page. Lumen's faces are Tiempos Headline and Söhne. Both are commercially licensed and neither is a free webfont, so neither is available on Google Fonts. The specimens below therefore render in the Vault's own declared fallback chain: Georgia for display, Inter for text. The proportions and the temperature are right, the letterforms are not the licensed ones. On a surface where the licensed faces are installed, the same stacks will pick them up automatically.
Display · Tiempos Headline · serif · Regular and Medium only
Told the truth. Treated with care.
You can always add. You cannot subtract.

Sentence case. Never all-caps a headline. All-caps is the category's default volume knob and this brand does not use it. Tight-ish leading, normal tracking. Do not letterspace display type. And never Bold, never Black: a bold serif headline is shouting in a nicer font.

Text · Söhne · sans-serif · Buch and Kräftig only
A neuromodulator relaxes the muscle that creases the skin between your brows. Most people see onset in three to five days, and three to four months before it softens. We start conservative. You can always add, and we would rather you leave with movement than without it. Consults are twenty minutes.
Body copy, captions, buttons, forms, navigation, every interface element. Short paragraphs. Whitespace reads as calm, and calm is the brand.
Request a consult Read the physician's story Wheaton Hills
Neuromodulator onset3–5 days Neuromodulator duration3–4 months Resurfacing downtime3–5 days

Tabular numerals in any clinical or tabular context. Dosing tables, timelines, anything in a column. Proportional figures in running prose.

The stacks

display
'Tiempos Headline', 'Tiempos Text', Georgia, serif
text
Söhne, Inter, -apple-system, 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, sans-serif
email
Georgia for display, Arial for text. Licensed webfonts do not render reliably in email clients. This is a correct outcome, not a compromise: a warm serif and a plain grotesque is the system, and Georgia with Arial is the system in its cheapest possible clothes.

Weights and sizes in use

Hero headline
Tiempos Headline, Regular or Medium. Never Bold. Sentence case, tight-ish leading.
Section heading
Tiempos Headline Regular. Normal tracking, never letterspaced.
Long-form editorial
Tiempos Text is the companion and is a legitimate body face in that context, for the physician's story or a treatment explainer.
Body
Söhne Buch, generous line spacing. Never the display serif.
Eyebrow label
Söhne, small caps, letterspaced. This is the only place a letterspaced treatment is allowed.
Button and form
Söhne Kräftig. Sentence case.
Clinical tables
Söhne with tabular numerals. Always.

Never

  • Script and calligraphic faces. Anything with a "signature" feel.
  • Thin and hairline weights. They collapse, and they read as luxury-adjacent.
  • Two serifs in one composition.
  • Letterspaced display serif. A luxury-brand tic, and a bad one.
  • All-caps headlines. Not for emphasis, not for a headline, not ever.
  • Exclamation points in medical copy. Ever. Not one.
  • Font pairings borrowed from a template.
Open item. Who holds the type licenses is unconfirmed: Fieldbrook or the practice, what the web license covers, and the seat count. If Fieldbrook holds them, that is a dependency the practice does not know it has, and it should be moved.
04

Voice

The med-spa category has a house style: gushing, gold-flecked, before/after-obsessed, and quietly shaming. It sells insecurity and it sounds like every competitor within fifteen miles. Lumen sounds like the opposite of that on purpose. The clinical calm is the whole differentiator.

The voice in one line
The doctor who tells you the truth.

Calm, precise, unhurried. We explain what a treatment does and what it doesn't, we never promise an outcome, and we never make anyone feel like a problem to be fixed. If a draft could run under a competitor's logo with the name swapped, it is wrong. Rewrite it.

The five tone dials

Clinical over cosmetic

We are a medical practice that happens to be beautiful, not a salon that happens to have needles. Lead with the medicine.

Precise over evocative

Name the product, the mechanism, the timeline. Specifics are the reassurance.

Plain over pretty

No poetry, no reverie. A patient reading at 11pm on their phone wants to know what happens to their face.

Respectful over aspirational

We never imply the reader needs fixing. Nobody is a "before."

Unhurried over urgent

No countdowns, no scarcity, no "book before we fill up." A medical decision is not a flash sale. And no exclamation points in medical copy, ever.

The five voice principles

  • Explain the mechanism. Our reader is educated, skeptical, and has read a lot of nonsense. Telling them how a thing works is the single most persuasive move available.
  • Name the tradeoff. Every treatment has downtime, cost, or limits. Saying so out loud is what makes everything else we say credible.
  • The consult is the offer. We are not selling a syringe. We are selling twenty minutes with a physician who will tell you whether this is even right for you, including when the answer is no.
  • No one is a problem. We write about faces the way a good doctor talks about them. Neutrally, without judgment, without a fix-it frame.
  • Never guarantee. Not in a caption, not in an ad, not in a DM reply, not "as a figure of speech."

The same post, twice

Don't
Say goodbye to those stubborn 11s! Our AMAZING injectors will erase your wrinkles and give you the flawless, ageless look you deserve. Book now, slots are FILLING FAST!

What is wrong with it: and the honest answer is nearly everything. "Stubborn" and "flaws" manufacture the deficit so the treatment can sell the fix. "Erase" is a claim, because a neuromodulator relaxes muscle, it does not remove a line. "Flawless" and "ageless" are guarantees. "You deserve" is shame in a compliment's clothing. And the urgency is a rule break on its own, before you get to the shouting, the exclamation points, and the syringe-and-sparkle emoji the category cannot write a caption without.

This is the category default, which is exactly why an AI will produce it unprompted. It is not a bad draft. It is a different company's draft.

Do
A neuromodulator relaxes the muscle that creases the skin between your brows. Onset is three to five days. Most people see three to four months before it softens. We start conservative. You can always add, and we would rather you leave with movement than without it. Consults are twenty minutes.

What replaced it: the mechanism (what it does to the muscle), the timeline (hedged, by key), the tradeoff (we deliberately under-treat, and here is why), and the consult as the only call to action. No promise. No price. No shame. Nothing anyone has to defend.

And note what makes it persuasive. It is not warmer than the "don't." It is more specific, and in a category built on mystique, the specificity IS the reassurance.

Words we use

licensed · physician-led · medical-grade · assess · plan · conservative · gradual · maintain · refresh · subtle · natural movement · rested · consult · candidate · timeline · onset · downtime · "we'll tell you if it won't work"

Words we never use

  • Shame-based: stubborn · problem areas · flaws · imperfections · anti-aging · fight, combat, battle · finally · "say goodbye to" · "the best version of you" · trouble spots
  • Hype: miracle · magic · transformation · life-changing · flawless · perfect · ageless · snatched · game-changer · glow-up
  • Urgency and sales: limited slots · book now · last chance · today only · don't miss · while supplies last
  • Non-compliant, never, in any context: guaranteed · permanent · risk-free · painless · no side effects · "FDA-approved" as a general product claim · "removes" or "eliminates" or "erases" wrinkles · "melts" or "destroys" fat · "doctor-recommended," unattributed
The near-misses are the dangerous ones. Each has the right temperature and the wrong content, and each will get approved if you do not catch it. "Natural-looking results" is an outcome claim, calm and restrained and still a guarantee. "Subtle enhancement" is still an outcome, and "enhancement" carries a deficit. "Confidence," in any construction: unmeasurable, and it is shame's favourite noun. "You deserve." "Let us help you," which presupposes she needs help. "Your journey," when she came in to ask about her forehead.
05

Pillars

Everything Lumen says is a version of one of these four. If a draft is not standing on one of them, it is not standing on anything. And not one of the four requires a claim to make, which is not a coincidence: the voice was built inside the constraint, and it is stronger for it.

Pillar 01

Physician-led

A doctor owns the outcome, not a franchise. Not a medical director who signs off remotely on a chain's protocol. Dr. Raman owns the practice, is in the building, and reviews every treatment plan. It is structural, not aspirational, which means a competitor cannot copy it with a better caption. A franchise cannot become physician-owned by claiming to be.

And it explains everything else. Conservative dosing, no package pressure, the same nurse every visit. None of those are policies bolted onto a spa. They are what falls out of a doctor owning the outcome.
What it sounds like "Every plan is reviewed by our Medical Director." No promise, no outcome, no superlative, nothing that needs hedging. And it is the most persuasive sentence in the account.
Pillar 02

Told the truth

We say what won't work, and when to do nothing. It is not a claim about honesty in general. It is much narrower and much more expensive: it means the consult where someone came in wanting filler and leaves with a skincare plan and no appointment.

It costs revenue in the room, often enough to notice, and it is by a distance the loudest theme in the reviews. That is the brand, said by someone other than us, and it is the strongest asset the practice owns.
What it sounds like "If it won't do what you're hoping, I'm going to tell you. That's not me being nice. That's the job." Dr. Priya Raman. Verbatim, and the second sentence is the whole thing. Do not cut it.
Pillar 03

Conservative by default

We under-treat and reassess. You can always add. You cannot subtract. This is not caution and it is not a hedge against being sued. It is a mathematical asymmetry. More can be done in two weeks. Too much has to be waited out, for months, sometimes with a correction procedure and its own risks stacked on top.

The two errors are not symmetrical, and a practice that treats them as symmetrical is not being aggressive. It is being bad at the job.
What it sounds like "We start light. You can always do more; you can't do less." The house rule, and the answer to about a third of all questions.
Pillar 04

No shame

The reader is not a problem to solve. The industry worked out that a woman who feels bad about her face will buy more than a woman who does not, and then built its entire marketing apparatus on that finding. Lumen refuses to participate, and that refusal is the emotional core of the brand rather than a tone preference.

The clinical calm is not a style. It is a physician refusing to participate.
What it sounds like "I was so nervous about being made to feel old. Not one second of that. They talk about your face like it's a face, not a problem." Andrea L. Ad-ready. Let a patient say it. It is stronger than we could ever be.

How to quote a patient

Verbatim, or not at all. First name and last initial, exactly as the Vault records it, with nothing added. If a quote is too long for the format, cut it. Never rewrite it. A tightened, tidied, or "punched up" review is a fabrication with a real person's name on it.

And a review is a review, never a clinical claim. We may quote what someone said. We may not convert it into evidence that a treatment works, or reframe it as an outcome anyone else should expect. A result described in a patient's voice is still a claim.

Adjacency does it too, and this is the part people miss. A quote placed next to a photo, a price, a treatment menu, or a product name becomes a claim you did not write and are still responsible for.

Four of the nine reviews in the corpus are ad-ready: Danielle R., Karen M., Priti S., Andrea L. They name no treatment, promise no result, and imply no timeline, which is exactly why they are safe. The other five are wonderful and they may not run in paid media, and the file says exactly why for each one.
06

Data

The governed numbers. Every figure Lumen has, each with a confidence flag and a rule for using it.

The rule

Every number in a Lumen deliverable comes from here, cited by key. Not from memory, not from a screenshot, not from a platform dashboard, not from the last deck. If a figure is not on these tables, it does not go in the deliverable. Write around it, or get it confirmed and promoted first. The absence is information.

An [internal] number is never published. It exists for targeting, budget math, and planning. It never appears as a hard public claim, in any costume: not as a range, not as an "average," not as a "starting at," not in a report a client will read out loud, and not in a direct message.

And the rule that matters most on this account: no number here may be used to imply a RESULT. A high review count is proof that people are happy. It is not proof that anyone will get a specific outcome. A treatment timeline describes what a treatment typically does. It does not describe what will happen to the person reading it. Every timeline below is hedged, and if you can delete the hedge and the sentence still parses as a promise, you never actually hedged. You decorated.

The business numbers

KeyValueConfidenceHow to use it
years_in_business 6 years
opened 2020
[verified] Secretary of State registration and opening press. Fine to state. Soft copy: "six years in Wheaton Hills."
physician_experience 17 years
11 in dermatology
[verified] The load-bearing credential in every trust asset. Cite it, never approximate it. Seventeen years in medicine, eleven of them in dermatology before founding Lumen. Not eleven years in aesthetics: eleven years in medicine, treating skin as an organ, which is a different education and it shows in how she talks about a face.
google_rating 4.8 [verified] Never publish without review_count alongside it. A rating alone invites "out of how many," and the answer to that question is what actually persuades.
review_count 412 [verified] Google reviews. Round down in copy: "400+ reviews." Re-pull monthly. It moves faster than anything else on this table.
treatments_performed 19,000+ [verified] Practice-management export, lifetime. Always keep the plus. Never state a precise count.
service_radius 15-mile radius
of Wheaton Hills
[verified] Single location. Use it for geo-targeting and "do you serve my area" copy. Never type a mileage figure from memory. Pull the key.
avg_ticket_value $340 [internal] Planning only. Never printed. Never implied as a price. Mean per-visit revenue, for targeting and mix. Lumen does not publish prices at all, and a printed or implied per-visit price is both wrong and a compliance problem. See section 07.
consult_wait_time 14–21 days [internal] The most volatile number in this Vault. Re-pull it monthly from the scheduling system. Days from request to first available consult. Used for funnel diagnosis and for setting expectations in reply templates. Never printed publicly. Public copy says "there's a wait, and it's real." The front desk says the number, live and current. A published number goes stale, and a stale number about a wait is a promise you broke.
monthly_leads 130 [internal] Internal reporting only. Consult requests across all channels, trailing three-month average. A rolling figure, which means it goes stale silently. When a month closes, the window moves and it has to be re-derived in the same sitting.
team_size 9 [internal] Never published. One physician, three nurse injectors, two laser techs, three front-of-house. In public copy this is "our licensed medical team," never the headcount. A small number is a fact, not a weakness, but it is nobody's business and it invites a comparison Lumen does not need to have.
membership_count 280
active members
[internal] The Glow Membership. Directional. Hedge it to "hundreds of members" if it is used publicly at all.
retention_rate 68% [internal] Strictly internal. Never a public claim, never in an ad. Twelve-month member retention.

The treatment timelines

These live in the services catalog rather than the business stats, because they are clinical facts, not business facts, and they carry a different rule: every one of them is hedged, always, and none of them is a promise to the reader.

KeyValueConfidenceHow to use it
consult_length 20 minutes [verified] Safe to state publicly. It is a core part of the offer, and in a sense it is the offer: Lumen sells twenty minutes with a physician who will tell you the truth.
neuromodulator_onset 3–5 days [verified] Time to visible onset. Always hedge with "most people." Never state it as a guarantee.
neuromodulator_duration 3–4 months [verified] Typical duration before the effect softens. Always hedged. Individual results vary and the copy has to say so.
filler_duration 6–18 months [verified] Depending on product and area. The range is genuinely wide and must be stated as a range. Never quote the top of the range alone. "Up to 18 months" is exactly the kind of claim we do not make.
resurfacing_downtime 3–5 days [verified] Visible downtime. NEVER minimize or omit this. Omitting downtime is a compliance violation, not a copy choice. The honest description, several days of looking like a bad sunburn, is on-brand and protective.
resurfacing_series_length 3–5 sessions
4–6 weeks apart
[verified] The timeline-education number. This is what prevents the worst conversation in the practice: someone booking a series two weeks before an event.

The rules that catch people

  • The pairing rule. The rating and the review count always appear together. Always.
  • The rounding rule. Public copy rounds down and keeps the plus. Never round up. A rating never gets rounded at all.
  • The dollar rule. There is one dollar figure in the entire brand and it is internal. If a deliverable seems to need a public number, that is a signal the deliverable is doing something Lumen does not do.
  • The freshness rule. The review count moves fastest, so re-pull it monthly. The consult wait time is the most volatile figure in the Vault and it goes stale silently. Re-confirm the rest quarterly, and immediately after any change: a new device, a new provider, a new membership tier.
What is deliberately not on these tables, and never will be. Before and after photo counts. Outcome percentages. Satisfaction percentages. "Results in X days" figures. These do not exist as canonical stats because they cannot be responsibly generalized from one face to another. If a deliverable seems to need one, that is a signal the deliverable is making a claim it shouldn't. Flag it. Do not source it.

Also absent: competitor numbers, which live in the internal competitive file and are never presented as Lumen's own.
07

Services

Lumen sells a twenty-minute consult with a physician who will tell you the truth. Everything below is what might happen after that consult. Never what will. That is not a positioning flourish: it is how every service page, ad, and caption should be structured. The consult is the call to action. The treatment is the context.

Line 01

Neuromodulators

Injectables

Relaxes the specific muscle that creases the skin above it. Most commonly the glabella (the "11s"), forehead, and crow's feet. Onset 3–5 days. Duration 3–4 months. Both hedged, always, and both pulled by key.

The house rule is conservative dosing. Lumen deliberately under-treats on a first visit and reassesses at two weeks. It is the single most important thing to communicate about this service, and it is also the reason patients say "it doesn't look done."

May not say"Erases" or "eliminates" wrinkles. It relaxes muscle. It does not remove lines. Also: "frozen" as an aspiration, any guarantee of onset or duration, "FDA-approved" attached to a treatment, and any specific unit count in public copy.
Line 02

Dermal filler

Injectables

Restores volume where it has been lost. Cheeks, temples, under-eye in select candidates, lips, jawline. Duration 6–18 months, stated as a range.

The house rule, again: conservative. The correction work the practice was built around is overwhelmingly overfilled faces. Copy should make it clear that less is the skill. And that not everyone is a candidate: the under-eye especially is not for most people.

May not say"Instant results." "Non-surgical facelift." Anything implying permanence. Anything implying a lift rather than a volume restoration.
Line 03

Fractional resurfacing

Laser and skin

Tone, texture, sun damage, scarring. Downtime 3–5 days, and it is never omitted, softened, or buried. The honest description, several days of looking like a bad sunburn, is on-brand and protective.

It takes a series, not a session: 3–5 sessions, 4–6 weeks apart. Candidacy is real and restrictive and depends on skin type. Copy must never imply anyone can walk in and book. It sells in the low-UV months. Do not push it in July and August.

May not say"Erases sun damage." "Permanent." "Painless." "No downtime." "Perfect skin." Any promise of a result.
Line 04

IPL, and laser hair removal

Laser and skin

IPL for redness and pigment. Lighter than resurfacing, less downtime, still not nothing.

Laser hair removal is the most transactional service on the menu, and the one most likely to attract a discount-seeking buyer who is not Lumen's patient. Never discount it, never lead with it in ads, and never use it as a wedge offer. It is a service Lumen provides, not a service Lumen markets on.

May not say"Permanent hair removal." The industry term of art is permanent hair reduction, and even that is a claim we do not lead with. This wording matters.
Line 05

Medical-grade skincare

Strategically underrated

Prescription-strength topicals and physician-selected product lines, dispensed after assessment.

It is the honest answer to a patient who is not a candidate for anything else yet, and it is frequently what a "talked me out of it" consult ends with. Content that treats skincare as a real clinical intervention rather than a retail upsell is very on-brand and very underused.

The open itemThe Vault carries no skincare timelines. No onset, no time-to-visible-change, no purge duration. Write around the number. Do not estimate one.
Line 06

The Glow Membership

Retention, not acquisition

A monthly membership covering skincare, a maintenance cadence, and member pricing.

Two hard rules. It is never sold at a first consult. Ever. That is a house rule and it is not up for negotiation. And its numbers are internal and do not appear in public copy.

Why the rule existsMarketing the membership as an acquisition offer would break the one promise the whole practice is built on: that nobody gets sold something before they have been examined.

What Lumen does not do

Referred out, without exception: weight-loss injectables, hormone therapy, IV drips and vitamin infusions, any surgical procedure, and anything requiring general anesthesia.

Copy never blurs this boundary. Never a "coming soon." Never an "ask us about." Never a landing page built for the keyword. Never engaging with a message asking about it beyond a polite referral.

And this matters more than it looks. The weight-loss injectable category is the single biggest revenue temptation in aesthetics right now, and Lumen's refusal to enter it is a positioning asset. Treat it as one. A practice that will walk away from the most lucrative thing in its own category is a practice you can believe about everything else.

Pricing

Claim rule 7, and it is absolute

No pricing in public copy. Ever. None. Not a range. Not a "starting at." Not a "packages from." Not in a direct message, and a direct message is public copy. Not in a comment reply.

And "free" is a price like any other. So is "complimentary." A zero is a number.

Aesthetic treatment is consultation-dependent. A published price implies a treatment plan that has not been made yet, for a person who has not been examined. Pricing conversations happen at the consult, and the number always comes before the commitment.

  • The compliant answer, which is Lumen's best sales asset and which most people mistake for a liability: "It depends on the plan, and the plan depends on your face, which is a real answer, not a dodge. The consult is where we work out what you actually need, including whether that's less than you came in for. We'll give you the number there, before anything is scheduled."
  • Every competitor either publishes a price or evades the question. Lumen does a third thing: it explains why the question cannot be answered yet, and the explanation happens to be the entire value proposition. A patient who hears that answer has just been told that a physician will examine her before anyone quotes her, which is exactly what she was afraid would not happen.
  • The word that makes it work is "dodge." Naming the suspicion out loud is what defuses it. Drop that clause and the whole answer collapses into evasion.
  • Never say: affordable · competitive pricing · options for every budget · packages available · DM for pricing · starting at · complimentary · free.
The most urgent open item in the Vault, and it lives here. Nobody has confirmed whether the consult carries a fee. Is it credited toward treatment if the patient proceeds? Is it waived under any circumstances? Until someone confirms it, the answer cannot be written, because "complimentary" and "free" are prices and claim rule 7 forbids them without a source.

Which means the Vault cannot currently answer one of the first two questions on every landing page in this category. The irony is not survivable and someone will notice it: a practice whose entire promise is that it tells you the number before you commit cannot be vague about the price of the appointment where it tells you the number. Do not guess. Do not write "complimentary." Do not write "free."